The authors (members of Congress) can be students and young scientists under 35 years (including). 

For participation in the Congress it is required to register before 31 January 2018 online on the website http://registration.bim.co.ua/.

REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF MATERIALS:

  • works directed to participate in the Congress should not be previously published or sent for publication to other editions;
  • one author may be published no more than in three abstracts;
  • the volume of print media from 2000 to 2500 characters, including spaces;
  • the text of the abstract should reflect the relevance, purpose, material and methods, results of research, conclusions;
  • the names of pharmaceutical companies, equipment, reagents are given in the original transcription; the results of the measurements in units of the International system (SI);
  • all abbreviations (except common ones) should be expanded at first use;
  • abstracts must not contain tables, graphs, illustrations;
ATTENTION!

Abstract structure

Case Report

Title: should briefly convey the main content of the work
Feature: the specifics of the clinical case, which caused the necessity to its detailed analysis
Case description: short synopsis of a clinical case
Discussion: a detailed description of the case features and treatment
Conclusions: should reflect the importance of the clinical case for medicine and/or directions of solving for this problem

Original study

Title: should briefly convey the main content of the study
Background: should highlight the necessity and the prospects of this study
Materials and methods: a list of materials and methods used in the study
Results: features of the research, its details and consequences
Conclusions: results of the study and the significance of this work for medicine and science

Scientific review

Title: should briefly convey the main content of the review
Introduction: should highlight the necessity and the prospects of this review
Aim: should reflect the goals which were set in writing the review
Discussion: detailed description of the features of scientific review
Conclusions: reflect the importance of this work for medicine and science